Dispute Resolution Lawyers in Netherlands

Commercial litigation, arbitration and mediation, including enforcement of foreign judgments.

4 Dispute Resolution firms · All firms offer English service · Free to be listed · Use the wizard →

Filter by specialisation

4 firms shown

White & Case

English likely
Amsterdam English, Dutch, German, French
★★★★☆ 4.2 (19 reviews)

International law firm with strong Netherlands practice in corporate and commercial law.

Dispute ResolutionCorporate MaBanking Finance

AKD

English likely
Amsterdam English, Dutch, German
View Google Reviews →

Dutch-based firm with international experience. Focus on corporate, employment, and real estate matters.

Dispute ResolutionCorporate MaReal EstateEmployment

Flintermans Advocaten

English likely
The Hague English, Dutch
View Google Reviews →

The Hague-based firm with broad commercial practice.

Dispute ResolutionCorporate MaReal EstateEmployment

Zegveld Advokaten

English likely
Amsterdam English, Dutch
View Google Reviews →

Amsterdam firm with expertise in corporate and real estate matters.

Dispute ResolutionCorporate MaReal EstateEmployment

Frequently Asked Questions — Dispute Resolution in Netherlands

Arbitration is often faster, private, and internationally enforceable under the New York Convention. Your lawyer can advise which route is better for your dispute.

EU judgments are generally enforceable across member states. Non-EU judgments require a separate recognition process. A litigation lawyer can advise.

Need an English-Speaking Lawyer in Netherlands?

Browse our verified directory of law firms across Netherlands's major cities. All listed firms offer English-language legal services to expats and foreign nationals.

Find My Lawyer in 60 Seconds

Dutch Dispute Resolution: Rv, Kantongerecht & Nederlands Arbitrage Instituut

Dutch civil procedure is governed by the Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering (Rv). The court system: Kantonrechter (district court judge, up to EUR 25,000 or employment/tenancy matters regardless of amount), Rechtbank (sector civiel) (above EUR 25,000), Gerechtshof (appeal), Hoge Raad (supreme court, law-only review). The Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC) in Amsterdam offers proceedings in English from first instance (launched 2019). The Nederlands Arbitrage Instituut (NAI) is the primary Dutch arbitration institution.

Court Fees (Griffierecht) — Civil Claims 2025

Claim ValueNatural PersonLegal Entity (rechtspersoon)Kantonrechter
Up to EUR 500EUR 85EUR 85EUR 85 (all kantonzaken)
EUR 501 - EUR 12,500EUR 85EUR 385EUR 85 / EUR 385
EUR 12,501 - EUR 25,000EUR 385EUR 677N/A (above kantonrechter limit: goes to rechtbank)
EUR 25,001 - EUR 100,000EUR 677EUR 2,013N/A
EUR 100,001 - EUR 1,000,000EUR 1,674EUR 4,030N/A
Above EUR 1,000,000EUR 2,013EUR 4,030N/A

Kort Geding (Interim Relief Proceedings)

The kort geding (preliminary injunction proceedings) is one of the most used Dutch procedural tools. Claimants can obtain urgent interim relief within 1-3 weeks (fast track: sometimes 24-48 hours in extreme urgency). Requirements: spoedeisend belang (urgent interest); provisional claim. No full trial; judge issues a voorlopige voorziening (provisional measure). Court fee: same as principal proceedings. Kort geding is used extensively for: IP injunctions, interim payments, urgent employment disputes, eviction, and competition law breaches.

NAI Arbitration

The Nederlands Arbitrage Instituut (NAI) (Rotterdam) administers arbitration under its 2015 Rules. Registration fee: EUR 1,750 (up to EUR 100,000 claim); scaled for higher amounts. Arbitrator fees per NAI schedule: approximately 1.5-3% of claim value. NAI arbitrations are governed by the Dutch Arbitration Act (Rv Arts. 1020-1077, updated 2015 to align with UNCITRAL Model Law). Emergency arbitrator: 48-hour appointment (NAI Rules Art. 42). Awards are recognized in New York Convention states. The Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC) also administers international commercial proceedings in English as a state court alternative to arbitration.

Case Study: Rotterdam B2B Logistics Dispute - EUR 340,000

A Dutch logistics company sued a Belgian shipping firm for EUR 340,000 in unpaid freight charges plus EUR 75,000 in demurrage. Filed at the Rechtbank Rotterdam (sector handel). Griffierecht: EUR 4,030 (company above EUR 100,000). The Belgian defendant raised a jurisdiction challenge (Rv Art. 11; Brussels Ibis Regulation — Dutch courts competent as place of performance was Rotterdam port). Challenge dismissed in 6 weeks. The case involved CMR Convention (Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road) applicability for the cross-border transport leg. The Rechtbank appointed no expert; both parties submitted e-CMR documentation. After 3 hearing sessions over 10 months, the court awarded EUR 310,000 in freight + EUR 42,000 in demurrage (reduced for shipper's contributory fault), with interest at the wettelijke handelsrente (statutory commercial interest, currently approximately 12%/year). Total costs for the claimant: EUR 4,030 (griffierecht) + EUR 28,000 (advocaat fees) + EUR 2,100 (deurwaarder/enforcement) = EUR 34,130 to recover EUR 352,000 principal and interest.